research-document RFR-E69DBA45
Create a shared benchmark and decision threshold: Composition Science Atlas Research Framework
RFR-E69DBA45 — Create a shared benchmark and decision threshold: Composition Science Atlas Research Framework
Research opportunity
Create a shared benchmark and decision threshold for the claims or recommendations in “Composition Science Atlas Research Framework.”
Background
The originating artifact is accepted by the repository publishing inventory with status “canonical-candidate.” Its 1. Governing Model section provides the immediate evidence boundary.
Evidence trace
- Origin document: content/projects/project-atlas/research-framework/composition-science-atlas-research-framework-v1.md
- Section:
1. Governing Model - Specific assumption challenged: The source's treatment in “1. Governing Model” is sufficiently supported for its intended scope.
- Supporting evidence excerpt: “Project Atlas contains six connected layers. text Disciplines ↓ Source Evidence ↓ Domain Findings ↓ Cross-Discipline Translations ↓ Candidate Principles and Boundary Conditions ↓ Theory, Predictions, Experiments, and Applications Each layer answers a different question. Layer Question --- --- Discipline Where did the …”
- Reason this opportunity exists: How competing methods or implementations compare on a common corpus with explicit utility, safety, and cost thresholds.
Unknowns
- How competing methods or implementations compare on a common corpus with explicit utility, safety, and cost thresholds.
Dependencies
Suggested REP and methodology
- Suggested REP:
REP-COMPOSITION-SCIENCE-ATLAS-RESEAR-BENCHMARK - Methodology: Curate representative cases, blind ground truth where possible, define baselines and uncertainty-aware metrics, and run reproducible benchmark evaluations.
- Expected outputs: Versioned benchmark, baseline implementations, scoring harness, datasheet, and adoption decision rule.
- Success criteria: Independent teams can reproduce scores and the benchmark discriminates meaningful quality differences without rewarding proxy gaming.
- Recommended agent:
research-engineering-agent - Estimated effort: Medium
- Expected knowledge gained: How competing methods or implementations compare on a common corpus with explicit utility, safety, and cost thresholds.
Evaluation
| Dimension | Score (1–5) |
|---|---|
| Knowledge gain | 4 |
| Potential impact | 4 |
| Cross-project reuse | 5 |
| Scientific importance | 5 |
| Dependency cost | 5 |
| Implementation difficulty | 3 |
| Frontier score | 392 |
Confidence in this opportunity: moderate. Status: Open.