research-document RFR-42FA1653

Map boundary conditions and failure regimes: Itten Color Contrasts — Experiment Pilot Cycle

RFR-42FA1653 — Map boundary conditions and failure regimes: Itten Color Contrasts — Experiment Pilot Cycle

Research opportunity

Map boundary conditions and failure regimes for the claims or recommendations in “Itten Color Contrasts — Experiment Pilot Cycle.”

Background

The originating artifact is accepted by the repository publishing inventory with status “computational-pilots-complete.” Its Purpose section provides the immediate evidence boundary.

Evidence trace

  • Origin document: content/projects/itten-color-contrasts/research-journal/2026-07-28-cycle-2-experiment-pilots.md
  • Section: Purpose
  • Specific assumption challenged: The source's treatment in “Purpose” is sufficiently supported for its intended scope.
  • Supporting evidence excerpt: “Move every proposed experiment from an undeveloped research gap to a reproducible pilot, an explicit result, a protocol, and a continuation state—without confusing model output with human or physical measurement.”
  • Reason this opportunity exists: The conditions under which the documented recommendation weakens, reverses, or creates a competing cost.

Unknowns

  • The conditions under which the documented recommendation weakens, reverses, or creates a competing cost.

Dependencies

Suggested REP and methodology

  • Suggested REP: REP-RJ-VE-ITTEN-002-BOUNDARY
  • Methodology: Use a factorial stress test across task, user, context, device, and consequence variables; model interactions rather than relying on aggregate means.
  • Expected outputs: Boundary-condition matrix, failure taxonomy, interaction model, and revised scope statement.
  • Success criteria: At least one credible failure regime is tested and the valid operating envelope is quantitatively described.
  • Recommended agent: experimentation-research-agent
  • Estimated effort: Medium
  • Expected knowledge gained: The conditions under which the documented recommendation weakens, reverses, or creates a competing cost.

Evaluation

Dimension Score (1–5)
Knowledge gain 4
Potential impact 5
Cross-project reuse 5
Scientific importance 5
Dependency cost 5
Implementation difficulty 4
Frontier score 491

Confidence in this opportunity: moderate. Status: Open.