research-document
Metadata Standard
Metadata Standard
Generated: 2026-07-22T15:10:59+00:00
Canonical Front Matter
---
id: DOC-0001
title: Example Title
abstract: One-paragraph summary focused on evidence and scope.
authors:
- Kevin Miller
created: 2026-07-21
updated: 2026-07-21
project: Composition Science
discipline: Composition Science
research_area:
- perception
- hierarchy
document_type: research-report
status: research-draft
evidence_level: B
confidence: medium
canonical: false
concepts:
- perception
- hierarchy
supersedes: []
superseded_by: []
related_documents: []
related_concepts: []
tags: []
keywords: []
source_stage: intake
reading_time_minutes: 12
machine_readable: true
llm_ingest: true
---
Required Fields
idtitleabstractcreatedupdatedprojectdocument_typestatuscanonicalconcepts
Controlled Vocabularies
- Status:
intake,draft,working-draft,research-draft,verified,approved,superseded,archived - Document type:
governance,ontology,knowledge-model,research-report,phase-report,evidence-registry,case-study,comparative-study,journal-entry,decision-record,experiment-report - Confidence:
low,medium,high - Evidence level:
A,B,C,D,E
Standardization Notes
- Use stable IDs instead of filename-only identity.
- Separate
createdfromupdated; do not overloaddate. - Prefer arrays for concepts, tags, and relationships.
- Keep filenames human-readable but treat metadata as the source of truth.