research-document EVREG-VE-ITTEN-001

Itten Color Contrasts Evidence Registry v1

Evidence registry

Ratings use A (convergent standards/reviews and replicated foundations), B (credible convergent evidence with material boundaries), C (limited/direct study or indirect transfer), and D (hypothesis/history only).

ID Evidence and persistent identifier Supports / contradicts Quality Limits
EV-ITTEN-001 CIECAM16, CIE 248:2022, DOI 10.25039/TR.248.2022 appearance depends on viewing conditions A related colors; not a spatial induction model
EV-ITTEN-002 Fairchild & Johnson, iCAM, DOI 10.1109/TIP.2006.884946 spatial/HDR appearance needs more than isolated color coordinates B model performance is image/task dependent
EV-ITTEN-003 Safdar et al., Jzazbz, DOI 10.1364/OE.25.015131 HDR-oriented perceptual modeling B not universal; later refinements exist
EV-ITTEN-004 Luo, Cui & Rigg, CIEDE2000, DOI 10.1002/col.10070 color difference is quantitatively modelable A reference conditions and suprathreshold fit limits
EV-ITTEN-005 Witzel & Gegenfurtner, DOI 10.1037/xhp0000349 categorical perception is conditional, not a complete sensory account B task and language dependent
EV-ITTEN-006 Gibson et al., DOI 10.1073/pnas.1619666114 color naming reflects use and differs across languages B naming is not raw discrimination
EV-ITTEN-007 Lindsey et al., DOI 10.1111/cogs.12907 shared sensory processes coexist with lexical restructuring B two language communities
EV-ITTEN-008 Werner et al., DOI 10.1364/JOSAA.27.000A14 aging reduces chromatic-spatial sensitivity while appearance partly compensates B broadband appearance can remain stable
EV-ITTEN-009 Sinha et al., DOI 10.1016/j.visres.2020.04.012 simultaneous brightness contrast has early contributions B mechanism remains open
EV-ITTEN-010 Blakeslee & McCourt, DOI 10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00186-3 multiscale filtering explains several brightness effects B not all grouping/context phenomena
EV-ITTEN-011 Shevell & Kingdom, DOI 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093619 chromatic induction is spatial/contextual and mechanism-plural A review predates newest display regimes
EV-ITTEN-012 Lotto & Purves, PMID 11058148 scene statistics/inference can predict color contrast changes B empirical account is contested, not exclusive
EV-ITTEN-013 Faul et al., DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01640 temporal variation suggests separable induction processes C small-sample factor analyses
EV-ITTEN-014 Fairchild, DOI 10.1002/col.20102 classifies appearance effects including contrast and assimilation B taxonomy/review rather than one experiment
EV-ITTEN-015 Hammond et al., DOI 10.1038/s41598-024-78751-2 hue–heat ratings are measurable and intensity dependent C small young sample; ratings, not thermal sensation
EV-ITTEN-016 Levitan et al., DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0101651 crossmodal color associations vary by culture/experience B odor-color, indirect for hue-temperature
EV-ITTEN-017 Itti, Koch & Niebur, DOI 10.1109/34.730558 multiscale feature competition can model bottom-up salience A gaze/task semantics not fully predicted
EV-ITTEN-018 Veale et al., DOI 10.1098/rstb.2016.0113 salience combines feature maps and neural competition A salience is not aesthetic balance
EV-ITTEN-019 Tatler et al., DOI 10.1167/11.5.5 task and scene meaning constrain eye guidance A framework/review; no universal composition score
EV-ITTEN-020 Hathibelagal, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0290782 contradicts global “more saturation fixes CVD” C small sample; some pairs improved
EV-ITTEN-021 Kugler et al., DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00680 CVD impairs peripheral search guidance more than foveal verification B naturalistic but specific red-on-green task
EV-ITTEN-022 Álvaro et al., DOI 10.1038/s41598-022-13877-9 colored filters did not compensate CVD performance B specific filters and tasks
EV-ITTEN-023 WCAG 2.2, https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/ minimum contrast and no color-only meaning A conformance floor, not performance guarantee
EV-ITTEN-024 ITU-R BT.2390-12, https://www.itu.int/pub/R-REP-BT.2390 HDR pipeline and ambient/viewing conditions matter A broadcast-oriented
EV-ITTEN-025 Land & McCann, DOI 10.1364/JOSA.61.000001 relational computation supports lightness/color constancy A classic model is not complete

Claim disposition ledger

Claim Disposition Primary evidence
Hue contrast is sensory and cognitive retain with boundaries 001, 004–008
Light–dark predicts structural visibility retain/elevate 009, 010, 023, 025
Warm/cool is a universal sensory axis reject strong form 015, 016
Complements derive from one universal wheel reject strong form 001, 011, 014
Simultaneous contrast is only lateral inhibition reject 009–014
Saturation is context-free intensity reject 001–003, 014, 020
Fixed color-area ratios predict balance withhold/retire 017–019
OLED/HDR preserve SDR relations reject 001–003, 024
More saturation solves CVD reject 020–022