research-document DFR-3D1114947579
Frontier analysis — Itten Color Contrasts — Experiment Pilot Cycle — Itten Color Contrasts / Research Journal / 2026 07 28 Cycle 2 Experiment Pilots
Frontier analysis — Itten Color Contrasts — Experiment Pilot Cycle — Itten Color Contrasts / Research Journal / 2026 07 28 Cycle 2 Experiment Pilots
Knowledge boundary
- Source: content/projects/itten-color-contrasts/research-journal/2026-07-28-cycle-2-experiment-pilots.md
- Status: computational-pilots-complete
- Discipline: Measurement
- Confidence: not explicitly stated
- Primary objective: Move every proposed experiment from an undeveloped research gap to a reproducible pilot, an explicit result, a protocol, and a continuation state—without confusing model output with human or physical measurement.
- Primary claims/evidence: Experiment Completed result Interpretation boundary --- --- --- EX-ITTEN-001 288-condition salience pipeline recovered generating sensitivities cannot validate area ratios EX-ITTEN-002 72 pairs showed metric-ranking disagreement cannot select a perceptual winner EX-ITTEN-003 48-condition adaptation proxy generated recovery predictions values are not HDR thresholds EX-ITTEN-004 792-condition CVD/aging audit flagged degradation not clinical detection rates EX-ITTEN-005 toy power reached .861 at n…
- Methodology: - Script: scripts/itten-color/run-computational-pilots.mjs - Seed: 20260728 - Experiments: 8 - Latest script SHA-256: e6f6ebae61ef8a1ff13c657b11d16b11f3981bb85a2040861e0bdf4b16d69996 - Output directory: ../experiments/data/ - Participant count: 0 - Physical devices measured: 0 - Human-subject conclusions promoted: 0
- Limitations/known uncertainties: Not explicitly labeled; the frontier records below treat missing replication, boundary, measurement, transfer, and benchmark evidence as unresolved.
Five highest-value opportunities
| Rank | Record | Category | Frontier score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RFR-352EB5BF — Independent validation of the central claim | Validation | 493 |
| 2 | RFR-CA11C48A — Calibrate construct and measurement validity | Measurement | 492 |
| 3 | RFR-A494DBA6 — Test cross-population and cross-context transfer | Accessibility | 492 |
| 4 | RFR-42FA1653 — Map boundary conditions and failure regimes | Experimentation | 491 |
| 5 | RFR-10971FA9 — Create a shared benchmark and decision threshold | Tooling | 392 |
Challenge and confidence decay
The source was challenged for construct validity, independent replication, boundary conditions, transfer, and comparative baselines. Confidence should decay when the source lacks a dated replication, when its technology or target population changes, or when later artifacts report contradictory findings. Revalidation is recommended before treating context-bound recommendations as universal.