research-document DFR-6B40AC660C07
Frontier analysis — Itten Color Contrasts Evidence Registry v1 — Itten Color Contrasts / Evidence Registry / Itten Color Evidence Registry V1
Frontier analysis — Itten Color Contrasts Evidence Registry v1 — Itten Color Contrasts / Evidence Registry / Itten Color Evidence Registry V1
Knowledge boundary
- Source: content/projects/itten-color-contrasts/evidence-registry/itten-color-evidence-registry-v1.md
- Status: active
- Discipline: Measurement
- Confidence: not explicitly stated
- Primary objective: concepts: - color - evidence
- Primary claims/evidence: Ratings use A (convergent standards/reviews and replicated foundations), B (credible convergent evidence with material boundaries), C (limited/direct study or indirect transfer), and D (hypothesis/history only). ID Evidence and persistent identifier Supports / contradicts Quality Limits --- --- --- ---: --- EV-ITTEN-001 CIECAM16, CIE 248:2022, DOI 10.25039/TR.248.2022 appearance depends on viewing conditions A related colors; not a spatial induction model EV-ITTEN-002 Fairchild & Johnson, iCAM,…
- Methodology: Claim Disposition Primary evidence --- --- --- Hue contrast is sensory and cognitive retain with boundaries 001, 004–008 Light–dark predicts structural visibility retain/elevate 009, 010, 023, 025 Warm/cool is a universal sensory axis reject strong form 015, 016 Complements derive from one universal wheel reject strong form 001, 011, 014 Simultaneous contrast is only lateral inhibition reject 009–014 Saturation is context-free intensity reject 001–003, 014, 020 Fixed color-area ratios predict b…
- Limitations/known uncertainties: Not explicitly labeled; the frontier records below treat missing replication, boundary, measurement, transfer, and benchmark evidence as unresolved.
Five highest-value opportunities
| Rank | Record | Category | Frontier score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RFR-20DD3DB2 — Independent validation of the central claim | Validation | 493 |
| 2 | RFR-DE4E7C8A — Calibrate construct and measurement validity | Measurement | 492 |
| 3 | RFR-905AE29D — Test cross-population and cross-context transfer | Accessibility | 492 |
| 4 | RFR-0690CCB9 — Map boundary conditions and failure regimes | Experimentation | 491 |
| 5 | RFR-6F3F68FC — Create a shared benchmark and decision threshold | Tooling | 392 |
Challenge and confidence decay
The source was challenged for construct validity, independent replication, boundary conditions, transfer, and comparative baselines. Confidence should decay when the source lacks a dated replication, when its technology or target population changes, or when later artifacts report contradictory findings. Revalidation is recommended before treating context-bound recommendations as universal.